OpenAI Raises Concerns: California’s AI Bill May Pose Risks to U.S. Innovation
Ryan Daws is a senior editor at TechForge Media with over a decade of experience in crafting compelling narratives and making complex topics accessible. His articles and interviews with industry leaders have earned him recognition as a key influencer by organizations like Onalytica. Under his leadership, publications have been praised by analyst firms such as Forrester for their excellence and performance. Connect with him on X (@gadget_ry) or Mastodon (@gadgetry@techhub.social).
OpenAI has added its voice to the growing chorus of tech leaders and politicians opposing a controversial AI safety bill in California. The company argues that the legislation, SB 1047, would stifle innovation and that regulation should be handled at a federal level.
In a letter sent to California State Senator Scott Wiener’s office, OpenAI expressed concerns that the bill could have “broad and significant” implications for US competitiveness and national security. The company argued that SB 1047 would threaten California’s position as a global leader in AI, prompting talent to seek “greater opportunity elsewhere.”
Introduced by Senator Wiener, the bill aims to enact “common sense safety standards” for companies developing large AI models exceeding specific size and cost thresholds. These standards would require companies to implement shut-down mechanisms, take “reasonable care” to prevent catastrophic outcomes, and submit compliance statements to the California attorney general. Failure to comply could result in lawsuits and civil penalties.
Lieutenant General John (Jack) Shanahan, former director of the JAIC at the US Department of Defense, supports the bill citing that it effectively addresses AI’s risks impacting civil and national security with “pragmatic solutions”.
The Honorable Andrew C. Weber, previously Assistant Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs, also stresses national security concerns.
According to Weber, “The theft of a powerful AI system from a leading lab by our adversaries would impose considerable risks on us all,” emphasizing the need for robust cybersecurity measures in AI development, which SB 1047 aims to strengthen.
However, SB 1047 faces strong criticism from prominent tech companies, startups, and venture capitalists who claim it could hinder technological progress and economic growth by overregulating a developing technology. OpenAI, impacted by the regulatory uncertainty, has reportedly halted expansion plans in San Francisco.
Senator Wiener defended the bill, stating that OpenAI’s letter fails to “criticise a single provision.” He dismissed concerns about talent exodus as “nonsensical,” stating that the law would apply to any company conducting business in California, regardless of their physical location. Wiener highlighted the bill’s “highly reasonable” requirement for large AI labs to test their models for catastrophic safety risks, a practice many have already committed to.
Critics, however, counter that mandating the submission of model details to the government will hinder innovation. They also fear that the threat of lawsuits will deter smaller, open-source developers from establishing startups. In response to the backlash, Senator Wiener recently amended the bill to eliminate criminal liability for non-compliant companies, safeguard smaller developers, and remove the proposed “Frontier Model Division.”
OpenAI maintains that a clear federal framework, rather than state-level regulation, is essential for preserving public safety while maintaining US competitiveness against rivals like China. The company highlighted the suitability of federal agencies, such as the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Department of Commerce, to govern AI risks.
Senator Wiener acknowledged the ideal of congressional action but expressed scepticism about its likelihood. He drew parallels with California’s data privacy law, passed in the absence of federal action, suggesting that inaction from Congress shouldn’t preclude California from taking a leading role.
The California state assembly is set to vote on SB 1047 this month. If passed, the bill will land on the desk of Governor Gavin Newsom, whose stance on the legislation remains unclear. However, Newsom has publicly recognized the need to balance AI innovation with risk mitigation.
See also: OpenAI delivers GPT-4o fine-tuning
Want to learn more about AI and big data from industry leaders? Check out AI & Big Data Expo taking place in Amsterdam, California, and London. The comprehensive event is co-located with other leading events including Intelligent Automation Conference, BlockX, Digital Transformation Week, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo.
Explore other upcoming enterprise technology events and webinars powered by TechForge here.
Tags: ai, california, government, law, legal, Legislation, openai, Politics, sb 1047, usa
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Discover the pinnacle of WordPress auto blogging technology with AutomationTools.AI. Harnessing the power of cutting-edge AI algorithms, AutomationTools.AI emerges as the foremost solution for effortlessly curating content from RSS feeds directly to your WordPress platform. Say goodbye to manual content curation and hello to seamless automation, as this innovative tool streamlines the process, saving you time and effort. Stay ahead of the curve in content management and elevate your WordPress website with AutomationTools.AI—the ultimate choice for efficient, dynamic, and hassle-free auto blogging. Learn More
